Skip to content

Model Behavior: Rick Rubin

Watch now (31 mins) | “I’m certainly not afraid of [AI]. With any new instrument, you can make bad sounds, and then someone figures out how to do it well.”

Substack <[email protected]>

Newsletters

Share
Sent with Substack Sends about 1 a week All facts

Substack promotes a special edition of Model Behavior, a series featuring top thinkers on AI, with an interview between founder Chris Best and legendary music producer Rick Rubin. They discuss AI's role in creative life, from writing to music, and Substack's introduction of the Pangram integration tool. Rick shares his thoughts on AI's potential in various genres and its influence on his own work.

What the raw message shows

From the headers

Sent with
Substack See it in the headers

In the HTML

Built with
Animated GIFs

Across Substack's email

Sends
About 1 a week
DMARC
Enforced, reject

Mail failing authentication is refused.

The copy

556 words · about 2 min to read

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

RR x CB AI Convo V7 DB_Edit.mp4

Watch now

Model Behavior: Rick Rubin

“I’m certainly not afraid of [AI]. With any new instrument, you can make bad sounds, and then someone figures out how to do it well.”

Rick Rubin and Chris Best

READ IN APP

In this special edition of Model Behavior—our series that asks top thinkers, writers, and creatives how they consider and use AI—Substack founder Chris Best speaks with legendary music producer Rick Rubin. Rick writes The Creative Act: Thoughtforms & Innerworks on Substack, where he shares reflective insights and practical creative exercises drawn from his approach to art and awareness.

Rick had questions for Chris about Substack’s decision to introduce the Pangram integration, a tool that lets readers check whether text was likely written by hand or with AI assistance. Chris, in turn, took the opportunity to ask Rick where he lands on AI in his own creative life, from writing to music. Along the way, they get into which genres AI music might be most successful in, the story of the discarded wah-wah pedal that helped define Jimi Hendrix’s sound, Rick’s slow conversion to Nine Inch Nails, and a sci-fi scenario where every album and film could be made for an audience of one.

What follows is a lightly edited version of their conversation.

Chris Best: I’ll be honest about where I am on AI writing, AI generation, and AI creative assistance: I don’t know what any of the answers are yet. This stuff is hitting the world like a tidal wave, and I don’t think anybody knows exactly what to think. There’s such a wide range of perspectives. And I’m building a platform, so I don’t want to wait until every answer is figured out before we make it good. I’d love to hear where your head is at.

Rick Rubin: It’s so early. We have no idea how AI will influence writing, or whether it will ever be good, or what its strengths and weaknesses will be. It’s a brand-new tool, like fire for the first time. Fire is dangerous and can burn down your house, but do we pretend it doesn’t exist, or make it illegal? I don’t know. It’s very powerful, and it can do a lot of things.

I’m curious about it, and I’m interested in interacting with it to understand it. But I don’t have a good grasp of how it works or where it’s strong or weak. Most of the time, the results I get back aren’t satisfactory. Even for something as simple as a Google search, I don’t feel great about what I’m getting. That said, it’s a cool new tool that keeps getting better, and I believe at some point we’ll find a really good use for it.

Chris: In the software industry, we’re already there. My co-founder and CTO Jai [Jairaj Sethi] has gone from sitting at a screen typing all day to managing a fleet of robots. He says, “Hey, fix this. Hey, make this good” and gets back a video of the thing working. It’s transformational in software, which is different from creative work.

Rick: If there were a machine that could tell how much of your coding was done with AI’s assistance and that were somehow vilified, what would you do?

The words as text: what a screen reader can follow, and all there is when images don't load.

What the headers say

Read from the message's own headers, as it arrived.

Came from
mg-201-125.static.mg2.substack.com · 161.38.201.125

Substack's sending servers

SPF
Pass for mg-d1.substack.com
DKIM
  • Pass signed by mg-d1.substack.com
DMARC
Pass for substack.com

Policy: reject

Unsubscribe
One-click

Meets the Gmail and Yahoo rule for bulk senders.

Complaints
Feedback loop set up

Mailbox providers can report spam complaints straight back to the sender.

Show all 28 headers

As received, minus the delivery side: the archive's own addresses show as [recipient], its mail servers as [receiver], signatures are left out and unsubscribe links trimmed to their host.

Route

Received Identifies Substack
from mg-201-125.static.mg2.substack.com (161.38.201.125) by [receiver] (cloudflare) id X1ARwfupu71t for <[recipient]>; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 18:14:48 +0000
Received
by 97a01db96c43e9c622ee92f941b3ddf909900476faa22027bf39e8a43bfcc020 with HTTP id 6ada5298a89ec6328b6d4a3d; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 18:14:47 GMT

Authentication

Received-SPF Authentication result
pass ([receiver]: domain of [recipient]@mg-d1.substack.com designates 161.38.201.125 as permitted sender) receiver=[receiver]; client-ip=161.38.201.125; envelope-from="[recipient]@mg-d1.substack.com"; helo=mg-201-125.static.mg2.substack.com;
Authentication-Results Authentication result
[receiver]; dkim=pass header.d=mg-d1.substack.com header.s=k1 header.b=G4K3pIBK; dmarc=pass header.from=substack.com policy.dmarc=reject; spf=none ([receiver]: no SPF records found for [email protected]) smtp.helo=mg-201-125.static.mg2.substack.com; spf=pass ([receiver]: domain of [recipient]@mg-d1.substack.com designates 161.38.201.125 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=[recipient]@mg-d1.substack.com; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=161.38.201.125

Platform

X-Mailgun-Sid
WyJkOWY3MSIsInN1YnN0YWNrQGluYm94YXJjaGl2ZS5vcmciLCIzOWIwOGM2Il0=
X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip
161.38.201.125
X-Mailgun-Batch-Id
6ada5298a89ec6328b6d4a3d
X-Mailgun-Tag
post
X-Mailgun-Track-Clicks
false
X-Mailgun-Variables
{"category": "post", "email_generated_at": "1792692887786", "is_freemail": "true", "open_tracking_suppressed": "", "post_audience": "everyone", "post_id": "221572936", "post_type": "podcast", "pub_community_enabled": "true", "publication_id": "1", "subdomain": "on", "user_id": "527064826"}

Unsubscribe and feedback

Feedback-Id
post-221572936:cat-post:pub-1:substack
List-Owner
<mailto:…@substack.com>
List-Url
<https://on.substack.com/…>
List-Archive
<https://on.substack.com/…>
List-Id
<on.substack.com>
List-Post
<https://on.substack.com/…>
List-Unsubscribe
<https://on.substack.com/…>
List-Unsubscribe-Post
List-Unsubscribe=One-Click

Message

Mime-Version
1.0
Content-Type
multipart/alternative; boundary="149d74ec254bb9abde4bdb0d730850414327ecfc6e625af1eb85a736899e"
Subject
Model Behavior: Rick Rubin
From
Substack <[email protected]>
Message-Id Identifies Substack
<[email protected]>
Date
Thu, 22 Oct 2026 17:02:29 +0000
Sender
Substack <[email protected]>
References
<[email protected]>
In-Reply-To
<[email protected]>
Reply-To
Substack <reply+3nx2rs&8psttm&&5e7232830509bb72741e27a1d9fcdec1ddb1ea018d085e8b2b2d52a89bd79871@mg1.substack.com>

More from Substack

All 21 emails
Substack

📝 Come join the Substack Notes Sprint!

Substack

You told us you wanted more control over your feed. Here’s the dial.

Substack

Open Tabs with Louise Jones

Substack

A CEO tried to bully a journalist into silence. He failed.

Similar campaigns from other brands

Different brands running the same play. Compare any of them side by side.

Universal Audio

New Video! Will Yip on Producing Turnstile, Title Fight, and More

Compare

Archived for reference and commentary. Substack, its logos and content are the property of their respective owners; Inbox Archive claims no affiliation and has disabled all links. If you own this content and would like it removed, get in touch.