Skip to content

The Trial of the Billionaires

Silicon Valley promised a revolution. Is a counterrevolution coming?

Arena Magazine <[email protected]>

Other

Share
Sent with Klaviyo Sends about 3 a week All facts

Arena Magazine promotes an article about the upcoming vote on a wealth tax on California's billionaires, proposing a one-time state tax equal to 5 percent of their net worth. The article, presented by Plaid, discusses the potential implications of the ballot initiative and its possible effects on the state's economy. Plaid is highlighted as the infrastructure needed for AI to work in finance.

What the raw message shows

From the headers

Sent with
Klaviyo See it in the headers

Across Arena Magazine's email

Sends
About 3 a week
DMARC
Not enforced

Failures are monitored but still delivered.

The copy

517 words · about 2 min to read

Telling the Great American Story, in Print!

The Trial of the Billionaires

Silicon Valley promised a revolution. This November, Californians will vote on whether they want a counterrevolution, instead. By Julia Steinberg.

Today's email is presented by Plaid

The wheel needed roads. Electricity needed the grid. Every great leap forward has needed something built underneath it to actually work at scale. AI is today's great leap. But in order to work in finance, it needs the infrastructure to make it accurate and dependable. Plaid is that infrastructure.

Can you vote for or against technological progress? In most elections, it’s not that simple. But this November, Californians will have as close an opportunity as any group of voters has ever had to do so. That opportunity comes in the form of a ballot initiative proposing a wealth tax on the state’s billionaires. Prop 40, sponsored by SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, one of California’s largest labor unions, is summarized as follows: “billionaires who were residents of California on January 1, 2026 would have to pay a one-time state tax equal to 5 percent of their net worth. The tax would be due in 2027.”

You may be asking yourself whether anyone — for or against it — could actually believe that, if passed, the wealth tax would be a “one-time” measure rather than the first of many. California has no plans to slow its rate of spending, trending to almost $400 billion annually. The measure’s official summary tells voters that “Ninety percent of the money would have to be spent on health care services for the public. The rest would have to be spent on education, food assistance, and administration of the wealth tax.”

California is infamous for its high taxes, but young people head west anyway, because that’s where the gold is. These two economic facts have coexisted for decades. Because California has supported so much of American technocapitalism in the last half century, it would have been hard to imagine a measure as extreme as a confiscatory wealth tax gaining serious traction. But Prop 40 has a real chance of passing in a few months. Something has changed in how the public views technology and the wealthy. That something is AI. And so, while Prop 40 presents itself as a tax on the ultrarich to prop up healthcare and education spending in California, it really should be thought of as a referendum on AI.

Of California’s 200 or so billionaires, most did not make their wealth by innovating in AI. A few did — like Cursor’s Michael Truell, Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, or Scale AI’s Alexandr Wang. Most made their wealth in the infrastructure of the technology boom that began with personal computers and exploded with the Internet. Sergey Brin, Eric Schmidt, and Jensen Huang were all rich before the AI wave (though they are considerably richer because of it). The state’s official ballot analysis, from the Legislative Analyst’s Office, tells us as much. “California Is Home to Many Billionaires,” the document says. “Many of these billionaires gained their wealth as executives or investors in California technology companies.”

The words as text: what a screen reader can follow, and all there is when images don't load.

What the headers say

Read from the message's own headers, as it arrived.

Came from
kl-203-20-12.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com · 170.203.20.12

Klaviyo's sending servers

SPF
Pass for k3.send.arenamag.com
DKIM
  • Pass signed by shared.klaviyomail.com
  • Pass signed by send.arenamag.com
DMARC
Pass for arenamag.com

Policy: none, so failures would still be delivered

Unsubscribe
One-click

Meets the Gmail and Yahoo rule for bulk senders.

Complaints
Feedback loop set up

Mailbox providers can report spam complaints straight back to the sender.

Show all 21 headers

As received, minus the delivery side: the archive's own addresses show as [recipient], its mail servers as [receiver], signatures are left out and unsubscribe links trimmed to their host.

Route

Received Identifies Klaviyo
from kl-203-20-12.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com (170.203.20.12) by [receiver] (cloudflare) id aSzNcRFrH21Q for <[recipient]>; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:00:34 +0000
Received Identifies Klaviyo
from unknown (HELO kmta-worker-prod-go-6cf9fc4b95-vzphb) ([email protected]@10.5.170.60) by kmta-mta-blue-0175af236c1061eda.servers.clovesoftware.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2026 12:00:33 -0000

Authentication

Received-SPF Authentication result
pass ([receiver]: domain of bounce-kl_28279663254-kl_101101m32jwjxy8h6fft-h-e9bde6396a=2@k3.send.arenamag.com designates 170.203.20.12 as permitted sender) receiver=[receiver]; client-ip=170.203.20.12; envelope-from="bounce-kl_28279663254-kl_101101m32jwjxy8h6fft-h-e9bde6396a=2@k3.send.arenamag.com"; helo=kl-203-20-12.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com;
Authentication-Results Authentication result
[receiver]; dkim=pass header.d=shared.klaviyomail.com header.s=def1 header.b=ZFdoyZfY; dkim=pass header.d=send.arenamag.com header.s=mtd1 header.b=iKhWNngJ; dmarc=pass header.from=arenamag.com policy.dmarc=none; spf=none ([receiver]: no SPF records found for [email protected]) smtp.helo=kl-203-20-12.kmta.shared.klaviyomail.com; spf=pass ([receiver]: domain of bounce-kl_28279663254-kl_101101m32jwjxy8h6fft-h-e9bde6396a=2@k3.send.arenamag.com designates 170.203.20.12 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bounce-kl_28279663254-kl_101101m32jwjxy8h6fft-h-e9bde6396a=2@k3.send.arenamag.com; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.203.20.12

Platform

X-Mailer-Info-Extra2
94acc45d35:0AdmZmNohTe4p2dqJzMtFDMxEDMx8FbrBwcAc mcv5SZ2lGajJXY49mYulGQh5WZyFGAyBgMx4yNx4CNuATMAA3bAITMtAjMtMDMy0CbrBg bvBQNxIDAp9GAt92YuwWah12b5lmdhx2auQWZyFGaz5SY012auITMtAjMtMDMy0CbrBAa vBANfh2ZphGAu1GA5cTOAkWbA02bj5yZh1WYuVmch5CZuV2cuMzaAJTPhZTOzYTZkJWOl 1CatQnZmZDa4kHeqdnayMTbxATMxATMfx2atQTNyMjN2kzNygjMfx2atU2YuV3biBgZtB ANfh2ZphGAtBAN1IzM2YTO3IDOy8FbrBAbAQlRGZDS4kFWKdlSyMTTxATMxATMAkGA91n IsFWduFWbiojI4JCLiQ0UOBDVZl1QTBFSzETOZp1STFTWFRzMNFDMiojItRnIsAzM0gzN wATO3EjOiQnIsIiQOhUUFBDNFdkQUZkR2gEOZhlSXpkMz0UMwIiOi0mIsIzM0gzNwATO3 EjOiQHaiwSM6ISbhNmIsIyRMZmetZlI6IyYisnOiQ0UOBDVZl1QTBFSzETOZp1STFTWFR zMNFDMisHIAMGAklDMllDZ5MzYwAjZ++
X-Mailer-Info
10.sGbfJDOycTO2YzMyUDN.sGbfFDMxEDMx02Myo2dqhXe4gmNmZGd.QYyVmbh BUauJ2b4FmcjhWa2VmLvJ3Z.gsnIwETTzQTRZFzULpVW5EzMIB1UDlVWUBjTTRkI6snIjJiOiYVb 6ZGTHJCLiMWYtJiOxwiIoRnI6EzN5ADM3gDNzIDLi0mI6ICMx00Myo0VKhVW4gkNGZEVCdUR0ATR RhkTCJCLiQnI6EzN5ADM3gDNzADLiQXbiojIwETTzQTRZFzULpVW5EzMIB1UDlVWUBjTTRkIsICe iojItFmb1FGbi0Xf..EDMxEDMx00Myo0VKhVW4gkNGZEV..
X-Mailer-Info-Extra
e9bde6396a:0UZkR2gEOZhlSXpkMz0UMwETMwEDApBQf9JCbh Vnbh1mI6ICeiwiIENlTwQVWZN0UQh0MxkTWat0UxkVR0MTTxAjI6ISb0JCLwMDN4cDMwk zNxojI0JCLiIkTIFVRwQTRHJEVGZkNIhTWYp0VKJzMNFDMiojItJCLyMDN4cDMwkzNxoj I0hmIsEjOi0WYjJCLicETmpXbWJiOiMmI7pjIENlTwQVWZN0UQh0MxkTWat0UxkVR0MTT xAjI7BCAjBwZy9mLlZXaoNmchh3bi5WaAFmblJXY++
X-Kmail-Account
VmzfLG
X-Kmail-Message
01M32JWJXY8H6FFTBGE40EQHNB
X-Kmail-Ops
01M2DNQM9PBPXNRBNYYSX9216V

Unsubscribe and feedback

CFBL-Address
[email protected]; report=arf
List-Unsubscribe
<https://manage.kmail-lists.com/…>, <mailto:…@shared.klaviyomail.com>
List-Unsubscribe-Post
List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
X-Report-Abuse
Please report any spam or abuse to: [email protected]

Message

Date
Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:00:32 +0000
MIME-Version
1.0
Message-ID
<[email protected]>
Reply-To
<[email protected]>
Subject
The Trial of the Billionaires
From
"Arena Magazine" <[email protected]>
Content-Type
multipart/alternative; boundary=7e56e8d946f33c15a7758345657d112ec9237895c63066a027b141706ecb

More from Arena Magazine

All 17 emails
Arena Magazine

Athens, Jerusalem, Rome, Nashville

Arena Magazine

Principals: Larsen Jensen

Arena Magazine

A Memory Palace for Software

Arena Magazine

Counting Beans

Archived for reference and commentary. Arena Magazine, its logos and content are the property of their respective owners; Inbox Archive claims no affiliation and has disabled all links. If you own this content and would like it removed, get in touch.