What we learned in our 3-year study
Hint: it’s not how high your spikes go
Levels <[email protected]>
Share
Levels publishes its first research paper based on a 3-year study of over 62,000 members' data. The study reveals key findings on glucose levels, insulin resistance, and the importance of continuous glucose monitoring. Levels shares five key takeaways from the research, including the significance of average glucose levels and the impact of glucose spikes.
What the raw message shows
From the headers
- Sent with
-
SendGrid See it in the headers
Across Levels's email
- Sends
- About 3 a week
- DMARC
-
Enforced, reject
Mail failing authentication is refused.
The copy
497 words · about 2 min to read · 2 buttons
What a gastroenterologist wants you to eat more of
Our first research paper is out. Here’s what we found.
For the past few years, more than 62,000 Levels members chose to share their CGM data, food and activity logs, and lab results for research. Today we’re publishing the first paper from that data, a preprint by physician-scientists Paul Ginart, MD, PhD, and Michael Loesche, MD, PhD, along with a new home for this work: Levels Research.
What makes this dataset unusual is who’s in it. Nearly 97% of people who shared labs were in the normal or prediabetes range, a group medical research rarely studies because it mostly looks at people who are already sick. If you were one of those members, thank you. Here’s what the researchers found.
Button See the full paper →
Five Key Takeaways
1. Your average glucose is the number to watch.
Of everything a CGM measures, it was most closely tied to insulin resistance: in the top quarter of average glucose, 36 in 100 people crossed a common insulin-resistance cutoff, compared with 8 in 100 in the bottom quarter. It was also the steadiest number from week to week, and about a week of CGM wear gave a reliable read.
2. Judge a glucose spike by how long it lasts, not how high it goes.
Among people with the same average glucose, taller or more frequent spikes weren’t linked to more insulin resistance. Wider ones were: when glucose stayed up longer, fasting insulin, triglycerides, and inflammation tended to run higher.
3. A normal A1c isn’t the whole picture.
Nearly a quarter of people with a normal HbA1c had an average glucose of 110 mg/dL or higher, and in that group high fasting insulin was about twice as common. A CGM may be most useful for younger adults, since A1c tends to creep up with age even when glucose doesn’t.
4. Give a food about five tries before you judge it.
The same food produced noticeably different responses from one meal to the next, so any single meal is really a snapshot of that day. Averaging around five meals gave a consistent picture of your typical response.
5. Carb sensitivity is real, but it’s not the same as insulin resistance.
Some people’s glucose rose about seven times as much per gram of carbs as others’, and each person’s response was fairly consistent. But steep and gentle responders had about the same insulin levels, so a steep carb response on its own isn’t a red flag.
One important note: Every result here is an association measured at a single point in time. None shows cause and effect, and none tracks long-term health. The research page walks through what each finding means, what it doesn’t, and the questions this study can’t answer yet.
Button See the full findings →
Looking to understand more about your metabolic health?
Explore our health news and advice site, Metabolic Insights
228 Park Ave South, PMB 63877, New York, NY 10003
The words as text: what a screen reader can follow, and all there is when images don't load.
What the headers say
Read from the message's own headers, as it arrived.
- Came from
-
o19.sg.m.dripemail2.com
· 168.245.68.155
SendGrid's sending servers
- SPF
- Pass for drip.levels.com
- DKIM
-
- Pass signed by levels.com
- DMARC
-
Pass for levels.com
Policy: reject
- Unsubscribe
-
One-click
Meets the Gmail and Yahoo rule for bulk senders.
- Complaints
- No feedback-loop header
Show all 17 headers Hide the headers
As received, minus the delivery side: the archive's own addresses show as [recipient], its mail servers as [receiver], signatures are left out and unsubscribe links trimmed to their host.
Route
- Received
- from o19.sg.m.dripemail2.com (168.245.68.155) by [receiver] (cloudflare) id HTcjlcHs40YL for <[recipient]>; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 16:00:06 +0000
- Received
- by recvd-59bfdd759-qjrc8 with SMTP id recvd-59bfdd759-qjrc8-1-6AF33847-39 2026-11-10 15:29:11.439559104 +0000 UTC m=+400670.856300855
- Received
- from MTMxMTA3NDc (unknown) by geopod-ismtpd-68 (SG) with HTTP id tVprh6jtQwOjIxtPESe5hQ Tue, 10 Nov 2026 15:29:11.429 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication
- Received-SPF Authentication result
- pass ([receiver]: domain of [recipient]@drip.levels.com designates 168.245.68.155 as permitted sender) receiver=[receiver]; client-ip=168.245.68.155; envelope-from="[recipient]@drip.levels.com"; helo=o19.sg.m.dripemail2.com;
- Authentication-Results Authentication result
- [receiver]; dkim=pass header.d=levels.com header.s=s1 header.b=p4bNSQbL; dmarc=pass header.from=levels.com policy.dmarc=reject; spf=none ([receiver]: no SPF records found for [email protected]) smtp.helo=o19.sg.m.dripemail2.com; spf=pass ([receiver]: domain of [recipient]@drip.levels.com designates 168.245.68.155 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=[recipient]@drip.levels.com; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=168.245.68.155
Platform
- X-Drip-SendingAccount
- 4080355
- X-SG-EID Identifies SendGrid
- u001.79kJZC85z/WE9t9nOmpiHosf7qU1Au+mrKy3jytIn8sMbSWRTgBdv9q1OykY6JKWnTluAuZYcXeyvQFE7WMJtckQdibRV+IGDdIcFMsFY9jvqHFpTiCf1se7ksZN1pt/+XK1uc3S3o1b6hBZnsyiN46r35Vo7E8uziCnzJRA0HBpZfCGNSeFAj8n+dhHCo9+7Nd735gTarJN2J0VfyOb/mRqfakkUyUAKYC8BNKT6x8=
- X-SG-ID Identifies SendGrid
- u001.SdBcvi+Evd/bQef8eZF3BpTL9BgbK5wfSJMJGMsmprCAf2TSkkcsbWsXt+6pnbIhH8M9BPJS4036yhLoCeQ62OASdqPVmzM7Y9BcmjUruPOxodOD2Kw83D+g1zmlcy4Wj8lVKCI2AtCyqqRw5O4csfp2xGNijpPrxdozBcjTwiTcjqPE121bC0DTfXuTQqPPTD4IhIeg6Cs32xBOMphODnTWMdm0HZK37QtvAfdXhcN3SlVg6yCYNKniSpBePlTCGmsOc0cGV2K02SC8/Kcqru4q6aBrB5nNiFBm4gGQdO3J6DXDlef7Xs9qNIRpptsUoqSrKKI0S6zFCR3Xman+sstMRMnqFa3uKX83VowqvhKyNTYYY4GGP0uubZ6zTdVVHy3XjLcZkKLRaOGyi2YQZHhB6p4i9VhcSWbydABhHH/JNUfzd4q37774HJkmEX4R3JLvHO04KfpNVvzmu5dmffmoxg4Mwo/5C+SEzemWK+seru7EIv1fMLI0ZYm8+abeaz5at4LzX+SvZ+Q5dHlpw9Lzk709c3I+MgYy9L1/CRgeMytZrAkLTv88DcGJzHU1Ta2QhRewg1ruLNp3iRFezFC8LGBRe3EEQbNcfnM0CMHVZB+2RORu3TcIzv3CaLHYyrtrMKWMCGnTeTVqWUC5Bmgt74NHZ+4NwIRJz5JxnMnOAMIuTtgvRChz1bKXhuDd
- X-Entity-ID
- u001.dEl2Z4sQ4dqI57TjhSSBBA==
Unsubscribe and feedback
- List-Unsubscribe
- <mailto:…@unsubscribe.dripemail3.com>, <https://unsubscribe.dripemail3.com/…>
- List-Unsubscribe-Post
- List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
Message
- Content-Type
- multipart/alternative; boundary=2634fa04198390110a5dcc3f908a8c0e97725c824a43ffdf5d9cb81f1573
- Date
- Tue, 10 Nov 2026 16:00:00 +0000 (UTC)
- From
- Levels <[email protected]>
- Mime-Version
- 1.0
- Message-ID
- <tVprh6jtQwOjIxtPESe5hQ@geopod-ismtpd-68>
- Subject
- What we learned in our 3-year study
More from Levels
All 32 emailsSimilar campaigns from other brands
Different brands running the same play. Compare any of them side by side.
Archived for reference and commentary. Levels, its logos and content are the property of their respective owners; Inbox Archive claims no affiliation and has disabled all links. If you own this content and would like it removed, get in touch.